"Kirill A. Shutemov" writes:
> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> "Kirill A. Shutemov" writes:
>>
>> > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> >> Currently we have few issues with P9_STATS_GEN:
>> >>
>> >> - We don't try to read st_gen anything except files or directories, but
>> >>still set P9_STATS_GEN bi
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" writes:
>
> > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> Currently we have few issues with P9_STATS_GEN:
> >>
> >> - We don't try to read st_gen anything except files or directories, but
> >>still set P9_STATS_GEN bit in st_result_mask. It may mislead clie
"Kirill A. Shutemov" writes:
> Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> Currently we have few issues with P9_STATS_GEN:
>>
>> - We don't try to read st_gen anything except files or directories, but
>>still set P9_STATS_GEN bit in st_result_mask. It may mislead client:
>>we present garbage as valid
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Currently we have few issues with P9_STATS_GEN:
>
> - We don't try to read st_gen anything except files or directories, but
>still set P9_STATS_GEN bit in st_result_mask. It may mislead client:
>we present garbage as valid st_gen.
>
> - If we failed to get va
Currently we have few issues with P9_STATS_GEN:
- We don't try to read st_gen anything except files or directories, but
still set P9_STATS_GEN bit in st_result_mask. It may mislead client:
we present garbage as valid st_gen.
- If we failed to get valid st_gen with ENOTTY, we ignore error,
