On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:39:51AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Am 27.09.2011 um 03:01 schrieb David Gibson :
>
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 09/20/2011 05:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> Ah, yes, here's the point. Updating git.qemu.org is not wi
Am 27.09.2011 um 03:01 schrieb David Gibson :
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 09/20/2011 05:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> Ah, yes, here's the point. Updating git.qemu.org is not within my
>>> power, so I can't myself construct a commit doing a submodule +
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/20/2011 05:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >Ah, yes, here's the point. Updating git.qemu.org is not within my
> >power, so I can't myself construct a commit doing a submodule + binary
> >update in this fashion.
>
> Sure you can.
On 09/20/2011 05:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
Ah, yes, here's the point. Updating git.qemu.org is not within my
power, so I can't myself construct a commit doing a submodule + binary
update in this fashion.
Sure you can. A submodule checkout is just like any other git commit.
A commit doing a
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 07:59:28AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 07:28 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >On 14 September 2011 13:24, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>Am 14.09.2011 um 13:01 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> >>>I confess to not really understanding how we keep the git
> >>>submodules and
