On 09/27/2011 12:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 27.09.2011, at 18:52, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 09/27/2011 07:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> So this is the main change, right? Why the -1? A guest could potentially
>>> access pib[-1] using this, no?
>>
>> Not with the values of addr that l
On 27.09.2011, at 19:04, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 10:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> 0xd
>> 0xe
>> 0xf
>>
>> ... and & 0x3 them
>>
>> 0x1
>> 0x2
>> 0x0
>
> That's a remarkably different AND function...
No, it's a typo. I typed % instead of & and didn't realize it. Bleks.
On 09/27/2011 10:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 0xd
> 0xe
> 0xf
>
> ... and & 0x3 them
>
> 0x1
> 0x2
> 0x0
That's a remarkably different AND function...
r~
On 27.09.2011, at 18:52, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/27/2011 07:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 27.09.2011, at 10:17, Liu Yu wrote:
>>> ---
>>> hw/ppce500_pci.c | 26 --
>>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppce500_pci.c b/hw/pp
On 09/27/2011 07:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 27.09.2011, at 10:17, Liu Yu wrote:
>> ---
>> hw/ppce500_pci.c | 26 --
>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppce500_pci.c b/hw/ppce500_pci.c
>> index 2db365d..3e24e85 100644
>> --- a/
