Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] qemu-iotests 069 and 111 are failing on NetBSD

2019-08-13 Thread John Snow
On 8/13/19 3:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 13/08/19 08:17, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 8/12/19 9:16 PM, John Snow wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 7/25/19 4:34 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: On 24/07/2019 18.29, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 24/07/19 11:34, Thomas Huth wrote: >> In case somebody is intere

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] qemu-iotests 069 and 111 are failing on NetBSD

2019-08-13 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 13/08/19 08:17, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 8/12/19 9:16 PM, John Snow wrote: >> >> >> On 7/25/19 4:34 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> On 24/07/2019 18.29, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 24/07/19 11:34, Thomas Huth wrote: > In case somebody is interested, two of the "auto" iotests are failing > on

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] qemu-iotests 069 and 111 are failing on NetBSD

2019-08-12 Thread Thomas Huth
On 8/12/19 9:16 PM, John Snow wrote: > > > On 7/25/19 4:34 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 24/07/2019 18.29, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 24/07/19 11:34, Thomas Huth wrote: In case somebody is interested, two of the "auto" iotests are failing on NetBSD due to non-matching output:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] qemu-iotests 069 and 111 are failing on NetBSD

2019-08-12 Thread John Snow
On 7/25/19 4:34 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 24/07/2019 18.29, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 24/07/19 11:34, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> In case somebody is interested, two of the "auto" iotests are failing >>> on NetBSD due to non-matching output: >>> >>> TESTiotest-qcow2: 069 [fail] >>> --- /var/