On 18.07.2016 19:04, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 07/18/2016 05:57 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 18.07.2016 17:48, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/18/2016 04:41 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 18.07.2016 14:30, Halil Pasic wrote:
> Make raw_open for POSIX more consistent in handling errors by s
On 07/18/2016 05:57 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 18.07.2016 17:48, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/18/2016 04:41 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>>> On 18.07.2016 14:30, Halil Pasic wrote:
Make raw_open for POSIX more consistent in handling errors by setting
the error object also when qemu_open fai
On 18.07.2016 17:48, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 07/18/2016 04:41 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 18.07.2016 14:30, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>> Make raw_open for POSIX more consistent in handling errors by setting
>>> the error object also when qemu_open fails. The error object was
>>> generally set in cas
On 07/18/2016 04:41 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 18.07.2016 14:30, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> Make raw_open for POSIX more consistent in handling errors by setting
>> the error object also when qemu_open fails. The error object was
>> generally set in case of errors, but I guess this case was overlooked.
On 18.07.2016 14:30, Halil Pasic wrote:
> Make raw_open for POSIX more consistent in handling errors by setting
> the error object also when qemu_open fails. The error object was
> generally set in case of errors, but I guess this case was overlooked.
> Do the same for win32.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ha