>
>
>
> >
> > I already spent 2h on this today, I have to continue other tasks
> > meanwhile, I might continue later.
>
> I spent 1 more hour installing the CodeScape MIPS SDK,...
Philippe, thank you so much for your 3 hours!
Regards,
Aleksandar
Hi Aleksandar,
On 7/18/19 8:20 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/16/19 8:20 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Aleksandar,
>>
>> On 7/16/19 7:09 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wro
On 7/16/19 8:20 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Aleksandar,
>
> On 7/16/19 7:09 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
I have multi
On 7/17/19 2:20 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> But, does "configure" list somewhere unmet soft dependencies? (the
> question is general, not looking at SDL only) Is there any other way for
> an end user to have info on unmet dependencies (whether soft or hard),
> other than see QEMU is not build
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:57 PM Eric Blake wrote:
>
> On 7/17/19 1:34 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>
> >
> > Daniel, that is fine, I don't question that, I basically wanted to start a
> > talk
> > between us to clarify some things. Related to our situation in the field,
> > I have a sub-questio
On 7/17/19 1:34 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>
> Daniel, that is fine, I don't question that, I basically wanted to start a
> talk
> between us to clarify some things. Related to our situation in the field,
> I have a sub-question to you:
>
> Let's say there is a build system with SDL 1.2, an
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 7:44 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
> > >
> > > On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 18:48, Aleksandar Markovic
wrote:
> "For distributions with frequent, short-lifetime releases, the project will
> aim to support all versions that are not end of life by their respective
> vendors. For the purposes of identifying supported software versions,
> the project wi
Hi Aleksandar,
On 7/16/19 7:09 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>>
>> On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>>> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>>>
>>> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
>>> S
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 08:06:24PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > It appears that Ubuntu 16.04 came originally with SDL 1.2, and
> > > SDL 2.0 was made available later on.
> >
> > That is not the case. Ubuntu has shipped both SDL 1.2 and 2.0
> > concurrently as options, even in the previou
> > It appears that Ubuntu 16.04 came originally with SDL 1.2, and
> > SDL 2.0 was made available later on.
>
> That is not the case. Ubuntu has shipped both SDL 1.2 and 2.0
> concurrently as options, even in the previous 14.04 LTS, and
> probably before that too.
>
Thank you for finding this out.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:41 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 12:17, Aleksandar Markovic
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
> >
> > I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> > SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossib
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> > On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
> > >
> > > I have multiple reports from end users that say that transit
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
> >
> > I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> > SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts
On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts.
> In that light, they don't appreciate removing SDL 1.2 suppo
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 01:17:01PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts.
> In that light, they don't appreciate r
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 12:17, Aleksandar Markovic
wrote:
>
> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts.
> In that light, they don't appreciate removing SD
Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts.
In that light, they don't appreciate removing SDL 1.2 support from
QEMU. The most notable example is Ubutnu 16.04, wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
