On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Bharata B Rao
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:07:30PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 07.07.2015 um 19:16 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> > From: Bharata B Rao
>> >
>> > Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
>> > created CPU always
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 09:07:30PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 07.07.2015 um 19:16 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> > From: Bharata B Rao
> >
> > Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
> > created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
> > index is
Am 07.07.2015 um 19:16 schrieb Andreas Färber:
> From: Bharata B Rao
>
> Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
> created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
> index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This is
> fine as long
From: Bharata B Rao
Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This is
fine as long as we only add CPUs, but there are architectures which
are
