On 3 January 2018 at 09:38, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
>
> Please, apply.
>
> Later, Juan.
>
>
> The following changes since commit 281f327487c9c9b1599f93c589a408bbf4a651b8:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'remotes/vivier/tags/
On 01/05/2018 12:59 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/03/2018 03:38 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
Please, apply.
Alexey Perevalov (6):
migration: introduce postcopy-blocktime capability
migration: add p
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 January 2018 at 09:59, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 01/03/2018 03:38 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
Please, apply.
>>>
Alexey Perevalov (6):
mi
On 5 January 2018 at 09:59, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 01/03/2018 03:38 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
>>>
>>> Please, apply.
>>>
>>
>>> Alexey Perevalov (6):
>>> migration: introduce postcopy-blockti
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/03/2018 03:38 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
>>
>> Please, apply.
>>
>
>> Alexey Perevalov (6):
>> migration: introduce postcopy-blocktime capability
>> migration: add postcopy blocktime ct
* Eric Blake (ebl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 01/03/2018 03:38 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
> >
> > Please, apply.
> >
>
> > Alexey Perevalov (6):
> > migration: introduce postcopy-blocktime capability
> > migra
On 01/03/2018 03:38 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
>
> Please, apply.
>
> Alexey Perevalov (6):
> migration: introduce postcopy-blocktime capability
> migration: add postcopy blocktime ctx into MigrationIncomingState
>
Hi
This are the changes for migration that are already reviewed.
Please, apply.
Later, Juan.
The following changes since commit 281f327487c9c9b1599f93c589a408bbf4a651b8:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/vivier/tags/m68k-for-2.12-pull-request'
into staging (2017-12-22 00:11:36 +)
On 28 June 2017 at 12:30, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is the migration pull request, it includes:
> - return path capability (peter)
> - objectify migration (peter)
> Thanks to all the people who helped debug the QOM/QAPI.
> - fix access to ramblocks (Haozhong)
> - add error hint to VMSTA
Hi
This is the migration pull request, it includes:
- return path capability (peter)
- objectify migration (peter)
Thanks to all the people who helped debug the QOM/QAPI.
- fix access to ramblocks (Haozhong)
- add error hint to VMSTATE*EQUAL macros (halil)
Fixed by hand the cases that didn't c
On 13 June 2017 at 10:51, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> This pull request includes:
> - don't set errp directly (eduardo)
> - isolate return path (peter)
> - rest of consistent output series
> - 10 first patches of the misc cleanup series
>
> Please, apply.
>
> Thanks, Juan.
>
> The following chan
Hi
This pull request includes:
- don't set errp directly (eduardo)
- isolate return path (peter)
- rest of consistent output series
- 10 first patches of the misc cleanup series
Please, apply.
Thanks, Juan.
The following changes since commit 9bba618f18b1a60a3f2668db82b453f6cd9467c0:
Merge re
Am 20.11.2015 um 15:00 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> Am 20.11.2015 um 14:53 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> > Am 20.11.2015 um 14:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> >> Am 20.11.2015 um 12:33 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> >>> On 20 November 2015 at 09:38, Peter Lieven wrote:
> I wonder if there is a glitch
Am 20.11.2015 um 14:53 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 20.11.2015 um 14:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
>> Am 20.11.2015 um 12:33 schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> On 20 November 2015 at 09:38, Peter Lieven wrote:
I wonder if there is a glitch in the PIO implementation of test-ide.c. As
far as I und
Am 20.11.2015 um 14:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> Am 20.11.2015 um 12:33 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> > On 20 November 2015 at 09:38, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> I wonder if there is a glitch in the PIO implementation of test-ide.c. As
> >> far as I understand the specs
> >> it is not allowed to re
Am 20.11.2015 um 12:33 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 20 November 2015 at 09:38, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> I wonder if there is a glitch in the PIO implementation of test-ide.c. As
>> far as I understand the specs
>> it is not allowed to read data while the BSY flag is set. With the following
>> chang
On 20 November 2015 at 09:38, Peter Lieven wrote:
> I wonder if there is a glitch in the PIO implementation of test-ide.c. As far
> as I understand the specs
> it is not allowed to read data while the BSY flag is set. With the following
> change to the test-ide script
> the test does not race:
>
Am 19.11.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Dr. David Alan Gilbert:
> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
>> On 19 November 2015 at 14:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 19 November 2015 at 13:21, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
On 19 November 2015 at 13:12, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> Hi. Unf
Am 19.11.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Dr. David Alan Gilbert:
> * Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
>> On 19 November 2015 at 14:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 19 November 2015 at 13:21, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
On 19 November 2015 at 13:12, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> Hi. Unf
On 11/19/2015 10:03 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 November 2015 at 14:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 19 November 2015 at 13:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 19 November 2015 at 13:12, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
Hi. Unfortunately this failed in 'make check' (x86-64 Linux, debug build):
>>
On 19 November 2015 at 11:20, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> In thiss pull request:
> - snapshot fixes. As it caused a crash are imprtant (Denis)
> - optimization that was lost on postcopy merge (Dave)
> - fix two very small issues discovered by coverity. (Dave)
>
> Apply, please.
>
>
> The follow
* Peter Maydell (peter.mayd...@linaro.org) wrote:
> On 19 November 2015 at 14:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 19 November 2015 at 13:21, Peter Maydell
> > wrote:
> >> On 19 November 2015 at 13:12, Peter Maydell
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi. Unfortunately this failed in 'make check' (x86-64 Linux, debu
On 19 November 2015 at 14:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 November 2015 at 13:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 19 November 2015 at 13:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Hi. Unfortunately this failed in 'make check' (x86-64 Linux, debug build):
>>>
>>> GTESTER check-qtest-i386
>>> blkdebug: Suspended re
On 19 November 2015 at 13:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 November 2015 at 13:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Hi. Unfortunately this failed in 'make check' (x86-64 Linux, debug build):
>>
>> GTESTER check-qtest-i386
>> blkdebug: Suspended request 'A'
>> blkdebug: Resuming request 'A'
>> **
>> ERROR:
On 19 November 2015 at 13:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 November 2015 at 11:20, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> In thiss pull request:
>> - snapshot fixes. As it caused a crash are imprtant (Denis)
>> - optimization that was lost on postcopy merge (Dave)
>> - fix two very small issues discov
On 19 November 2015 at 11:20, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> In thiss pull request:
> - snapshot fixes. As it caused a crash are imprtant (Denis)
> - optimization that was lost on postcopy merge (Dave)
> - fix two very small issues discovered by coverity. (Dave)
>
> Apply, please.
>
>
> The follow
Hi
In thiss pull request:
- snapshot fixes. As it caused a crash are imprtant (Denis)
- optimization that was lost on postcopy merge (Dave)
- fix two very small issues discovered by coverity. (Dave)
Apply, please.
The following changes since commit 8f280309030331a912fd8924c129d8bd59e1bdc7:
27 matches
Mail list logo
