On 01/10/2018 06:47 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> Ah. But maybe a different version to older ARM32s?
No, the bug affected all arm32 back to the beginning of time.
> I'm trying to figure out why I entirely failed to reproduce this on a
> Raspberry Pi 1 (and a couple of other arm32 machines, but I for
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:33:41PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 02:55, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:15:25PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 9 January 2018 at 12:16, David Gibson
> >> wrote:
> >>> Thanks. Even if you can identify which patch it is and we c
On 10/01/2018 02:55, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:15:25PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 9 January 2018 at 12:16, David Gibson wrote:
>>> Thanks. Even if you can identify which patch it is and we can
>>> postpone that one would be a bug help.
>>
>> Bisection blames this one
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:15:25PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 January 2018 at 12:16, David Gibson wrote:
> > Thanks. Even if you can identify which patch it is and we can
> > postpone that one would be a bug help.
>
> Bisection blames this one:
>
> pbonz...@redhat.com (1):
> targe
On 01/09/2018 07:15 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> (This is a build for arm32, running in a chroot on an aarch64
> box, non-debug build.)
It's an arm backend problem.
For 64-bit setcond2, we do
0x6e5c3fa4: e1570008 cmp r7, r8
0x6e5c3fa8: 01550004 cmpeqr5, r4
0x6e5c3fac: b3a09001 movlt
Quoting Paolo Bonzini (2018-01-09 11:34:48)
> On 09/01/2018 17:02, Michael Roth wrote:
> >> so you can see it's already diverged because it prints out
> >> a different value for the name of the pci node and the
> >> SCSI line has 8200 vs .
> > FYI I actually see this with a rasp
On 09/01/2018 17:02, Michael Roth wrote:
>> so you can see it's already diverged because it prints out
>> a different value for the name of the pci node and the
>> SCSI line has 8200 vs .
> FYI I actually see this with a raspberry pi 3 too
Is this an arm32 or aarch64 install?
Quoting Peter Maydell (2018-01-09 09:15:25)
> On 9 January 2018 at 12:16, David Gibson wrote:
> > Thanks. Even if you can identify which patch it is and we can
> > postpone that one would be a bug help.
>
> Bisection blames this one:
>
> pbonz...@redhat.com (1):
> target-ppc: optimize cmp
On 9 January 2018 at 12:16, David Gibson wrote:
> Thanks. Even if you can identify which patch it is and we can
> postpone that one would be a bug help.
Bisection blames this one:
pbonz...@redhat.com (1):
target-ppc: optimize cmp translation
A plain boot doesn't work either:
./build/ppc/
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:46:41AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 January 2018 at 05:53, David Gibson wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 281f327487c9c9b1599f93c589a408bbf4a651b8:
> >
> > Merge remote-tracking branch
> > 'remotes/vivier/tags/m68k-for-2.12-pull-request' into stagin
On 8 January 2018 at 05:53, David Gibson wrote:
> The following changes since commit 281f327487c9c9b1599f93c589a408bbf4a651b8:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'remotes/vivier/tags/m68k-for-2.12-pull-request' into staging (2017-12-22
> 00:11:36 +)
>
> are available in the Git repository
The following changes since commit 281f327487c9c9b1599f93c589a408bbf4a651b8:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/vivier/tags/m68k-for-2.12-pull-request'
into staging (2017-12-22 00:11:36 +)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://github.com/dgibson/qemu.git tags/ppc-for-2.12-201
12 matches
Mail list logo
