On 4 October 2012 19:56, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> (Does the compiler really insist on that cast?)
>
> Yes. Without it, I get a warning/failure when char is signed.
> See below.
Ah yes, signed vs unsigned char. Thanks for the clarification.
-- PMM
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 October 2012 12:09, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> From: Jim Meyering
>>
>> Don't bother with strncpy. There's no need for its zero-fill.
>> Use g_strndup in place of g_malloc+strncpy+NUL-terminate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering
>> ---
>> ui/vnc-auth-sasl.c | 4 +---
>>
On 4 October 2012 12:09, Jim Meyering wrote:
> From: Jim Meyering
>
> Don't bother with strncpy. There's no need for its zero-fill.
> Use g_strndup in place of g_malloc+strncpy+NUL-terminate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering
> ---
> ui/vnc-auth-sasl.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
From: Jim Meyering
Don't bother with strncpy. There's no need for its zero-fill.
Use g_strndup in place of g_malloc+strncpy+NUL-terminate.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering
---
ui/vnc-auth-sasl.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ui/vnc-auth-sasl.c b/ui/vnc-auth
