Hi,
Hmm. Alon, is it an option to just leave the whole qxl-render stuff
in sync mode for now and convert it later? Or will that have bad
interactions with QXL_IO_UPDATE_AREA_ASYNC being used by the guest?
It's not a problem. I do have a working version using async monitor command, but
I wi
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:45:16PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/13/11 14:32, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>Not sure. Luiz, do we have async monitor commands meanwhile?
> >
> >Not yet, this is a QAPI feature that should land soon, but it's not
> >available yet.
>
> Hmm. Alon, is it an option
On 07/13/11 14:32, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Not sure. Luiz, do we have async monitor commands meanwhile?
Not yet, this is a QAPI feature that should land soon, but it's not
available yet.
Hmm. Alon, is it an option to just leave the whole qxl-render stuff in
sync mode for now and convert it
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:56:55 +0300
Alon Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:33:26AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:29:16 +0300
> > Alon Levy wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > > On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:33:26AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:29:16 +0300
> Alon Levy wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wr
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:29:16 +0300
Alon Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > >>On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
> > >>>Later the save will hap
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:46:50 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>Hi,
>
> > I'd rather try the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC thing then the cond variable, it's
> > becoming pretty
> > ugly. Also I guess what Daniel described is possible, but it changes the
> > usage of screendump
> > even more. Is turning do_s
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:41:48 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
> >>> Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
> >>
> >> Hmm. I
Hi,
I'd rather try the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC thing then the cond variable, it's
becoming pretty
ugly. Also I guess what Daniel described is possible, but it changes the usage
of screendump
even more. Is turning do_screen_dump to async viable? I think I'll work on it.
Daniel's suggestion is a n
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
> >>>Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
> >>
> >>Hmm. I
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
> >Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
>
> Hmm. I can see why you are doing that. It makes the file being
> written *after* the monitor command finishes though,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
> >>>Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
> >>
> >>Hmm. I
On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
Hmm. I can see why you are doing that. It makes the file being
written *after* the mo
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
> >Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
>
> Hmm. I can see why you are doing that. It makes the file being
> written *after* the monitor command finishes though,
On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote:
Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
Hmm. I can see why you are doing that. It makes the file being written
*after* the monitor command finishes though, which I think we should avoid.
cheers,
Gerd
Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback.
---
hw/qxl-render.c | 10 ++
hw/qxl.c|2 +-
hw/qxl.h|2 ++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/qxl-render.c b/hw/qxl-render.c
index 60b822d..e64b646 100644
--- a/
16 matches
Mail list logo
