On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:49:04PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:06:21 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
> > on VFIO devices operates by bypassing the usual VFIO logic with
> > vfio_container_ioctl
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:06:21 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
> on VFIO devices operates by bypassing the usual VFIO logic with
> vfio_container_ioctl(). That's a poorly designed interface with unclear
> semantics about exactl
On 02/29/2016 06:06 PM, David Gibson wrote:
At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
on VFIO devices operates by bypassing the usual VFIO logic with
vfio_container_ioctl(). That's a poorly designed interface with unclear
semantics about exactly what can be opera
At present the code handling IBM's Enhanced Error Handling (EEH) interface
on VFIO devices operates by bypassing the usual VFIO logic with
vfio_container_ioctl(). That's a poorly designed interface with unclear
semantics about exactly what can be operated on.
In particular it operates on a single
