On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:56 PM Michael Clark wrote:
> satp is WARL so it should not trap on illegal writes, rather
> it can be hardwired to zero and silently ignore illegal writes.
> It seems the RISC-V WARL behaviour is preferred to having to
> trap overhead versus simply reading back the valu
satp is WARL so it should not trap on illegal writes, rather
it can be hardwired to zero and silently ignore illegal writes.
It seems the RISC-V WARL behaviour is preferred to having to
trap overhead versus simply reading back the value and checking
if the write took (saves hundreds of cycles and
