On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 08:30:49AM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:42:43PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Can you pls check refs/
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 08:30:49AM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:42:43PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Can you pls check refs/heads/for_thibaut?
> >> > It should have your patch as the latest c
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:42:43PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
>> >
>> > Can you pls check refs/heads/for_thibaut?
>> > It should have your patch as the latest commit.
>>
>> I do not see yet my patch on the for_thibaut branch
>
> Ouch.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:42:43PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
> >
> > Can you pls check refs/heads/for_thibaut?
> > It should have your patch as the latest commit.
>
> I do not see yet my patch on the for_thibaut branch
Ouch. I meant refs/tags/for_thibaut.
Sorry about that.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:22:12PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:19:41PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I have sti
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:22:12PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:19:41PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have still a comment on this serie. During rebase operation with
> > > mult
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:19:41PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have still a comment on this serie. During rebase operation with
> > multiqueue a
> > modification has been lost.
> > This lost impact only guest witho
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:19:41PM +0200, Thibaut Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have still a comment on this serie. During rebase operation with multiqueue
> a
> modification has been lost.
> This lost impact only guest without GUEST_ANNOUNCE capabilities: the backend
> is
> not notified to send a f
Hi,
I have still a comment on this serie. During rebase operation with
multiqueue a modification has been lost.
This lost impact only guest without GUEST_ANNOUNCE capabilities: the
backend is not notified to send a fake RARP to reduce VM outage.
Sorry for the late notice but I have tested only re
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:17 PM, wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Hi,
>
> The following series implement shareable log for vhost-user to support
> memory tracking during live migration. On qemu-side, the solution is
> fairly straightfoward since vhost already supports the dirty log, only
> vh
From: Marc-André Lureau
Hi,
The following series implement shareable log for vhost-user to support
memory tracking during live migration. On qemu-side, the solution is
fairly straightfoward since vhost already supports the dirty log, only
vhost-user couldn't access the log memory until then.
Th
11 matches
Mail list logo
