On 2014/8/20 23:03, Michael Tokarev wrote:
20.08.2014 18:57, Michael Tokarev пишет:
19.08.2014 12:30, zhanghailiang wrote:
Here we don't check the return value of malloc() which may fail.
Use the g_new() instead, which will abort the program when
there is not enough memory.
Also, use g_strdup
20.08.2014 18:57, Michael Tokarev пишет:
> 19.08.2014 12:30, zhanghailiang wrote:
>> Here we don't check the return value of malloc() which may fail.
>> Use the g_new() instead, which will abort the program when
>> there is not enough memory.
>>
>> Also, use g_strdup instead of strdup and remove th
19.08.2014 12:30, zhanghailiang wrote:
> Here we don't check the return value of malloc() which may fail.
> Use the g_new() instead, which will abort the program when
> there is not enough memory.
>
> Also, use g_strdup instead of strdup and remove the unnecessary
> strdup function.
I also will r
The Tuesday 19 Aug 2014 à 16:30:17 (+0800), zhanghailiang wrote :
> Here we don't check the return value of malloc() which may fail.
> Use the g_new() instead, which will abort the program when
> there is not enough memory.
>
> Also, use g_strdup instead of strdup and remove the unnecessary
> strd
Here we don't check the return value of malloc() which may fail.
Use the g_new() instead, which will abort the program when
there is not enough memory.
Also, use g_strdup instead of strdup and remove the unnecessary
strdup function.
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée
---
sli
