* Amit Shah (amit.s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On (Tue) 16 Jun 2015 [11:26:47], Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > In postcopy, the destination guest is running at the same time
> > as it's receiving pages; as we receive new pages we must put
> > them into
On (Tue) 16 Jun 2015 [11:26:47], Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> In postcopy, the destination guest is running at the same time
> as it's receiving pages; as we receive new pages we must put
> them into the guests address space atomically to avoid a runnin
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > In postcopy, the destination guest is running at the same time
> > as it's receiving pages; as we receive new pages we must put
> > them into the guests address space at
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> In postcopy, the destination guest is running at the same time
> as it's receiving pages; as we receive new pages we must put
> them into the guests address space atomically to avoid a running
> CPU accessing a partially w
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
In postcopy, the destination guest is running at the same time
as it's receiving pages; as we receive new pages we must put
them into the guests address space atomically to avoid a running
CPU accessing a partially written page.
Use the helpers in postcopy-ram.c to
