Eric Blake writes:
> For the sake of humans reading introspection output, it is nice
> to have the name of implicit array types be recognizable as
> arrays of the underlying type. However, while this patch allows
> humans to skip from a command with return type "[123]" straight
> to the definiti
For the sake of humans reading introspection output, it is nice
to have the name of implicit array types be recognizable as
arrays of the underlying type. However, while this patch allows
humans to skip from a command with return type "[123]" straight
to the definition of type "123" without having
