On 04/28/2015 07:00 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> A future patch will be using a 'name':{dictionary} entry in the
>> QAPI schema to specify a default value for an optional argument;
>> but existing use of inline nested structs conflicts with that goal.
>>
>> +++ b/tests/
Eric Blake writes:
> A future patch will be using a 'name':{dictionary} entry in the
> QAPI schema to specify a default value for an optional argument;
> but existing use of inline nested structs conflicts with that goal.
>
> More precisely, a definition in the QAPI schema associates a name
> wit
A future patch will be using a 'name':{dictionary} entry in the
QAPI schema to specify a default value for an optional argument;
but existing use of inline nested structs conflicts with that goal.
More precisely, a definition in the QAPI schema associates a name
with a set of properties:
Example
