09.08.2019 19:13, Max Reitz wrote:
> This changes iotest 204's output, because blkdebug on top of a COW node
> used to make qemu-img map disregard the rest of the backing chain (the
> backing chain was broken by the filter). With this patch, the
> allocation in the base image is reported correctly
On 12.08.19 14:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 09.08.2019 19:13, Max Reitz wrote:
>> This changes iotest 204's output, because blkdebug on top of a COW node
>> used to make qemu-img map disregard the rest of the backing chain (the
>> backing chain was broken by the filter). With this pat
09.08.2019 19:13, Max Reitz wrote:
> This changes iotest 204's output, because blkdebug on top of a COW node
> used to make qemu-img map disregard the rest of the backing chain (the
> backing chain was broken by the filter). With this patch, the
> allocation in the base image is reported correctly
This changes iotest 204's output, because blkdebug on top of a COW node
used to make qemu-img map disregard the rest of the backing chain (the
backing chain was broken by the filter). With this patch, the
allocation in the base image is reported correctly.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
qemu-img.
