On 09/23/2014 05:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I'm not sure a full-fledged feature negotiation system is needed. The
ivshmem protocol is local to the host and all participants are under
control of the administrator.
I suggested a protocol version to protect against misconfiguration. For
exampl
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:49:48PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > Send a protocol version as the first message from server, clients must close
> > communication if they don't support this protocol version.
>
> What's the motiv
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> Send a protocol version as the first message from server, clients must close
> communication if they don't support this protocol version.
What's the motivation here?
This is at best a way to break all clients if an incompatible
chan
Send a protocol version as the first message from server, clients must close
communication if they don't support this protocol version.
Older QEMUs should be fine with this change in the protocol since they overrides
their own vm_id on reception of an id associated to no eventfd.
Signed-off-by: Da
