On 11/09/2015 06:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:56:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Currently, file_ram_alloc() only works on directory - it creates a file
under @path and do mmap on it
This patch tries to allow it to work on file directly, if @path is a
director
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:56:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Currently, file_ram_alloc() only works on directory - it creates a file
> under @path and do mmap on it
>
> This patch tries to allow it to work on file directly, if @path is a
> directory it works as before, otherwise it treats @pa
On 10/30/2015 10:25 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 30.10.2015 08:56, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Currently, file_ram_alloc() only works on directory - it creates a file
under @path and do mmap on it
This patch tries to allow it to work on file directly, if @path is a
directory it works
On 30.10.2015 08:56, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Currently, file_ram_alloc() only works on directory - it creates a file
under @path and do mmap on it
This patch tries to allow it to work on file directly, if @path is a
directory it works as before, otherwise it treats @path as the target
file then di
Currently, file_ram_alloc() only works on directory - it creates a file
under @path and do mmap on it
This patch tries to allow it to work on file directly, if @path is a
directory it works as before, otherwise it treats @path as the target
file then directly allocate memory from it
Signed-off-by
