Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 16/16] blockdev: document transactional shortcomings

2018-09-07 Thread Max Reitz
On 2018-09-06 15:02, John Snow wrote: > Presently only the backup job really guarantees what one would consider > transactional semantics. To guard against someone helpfully adding them > in the future, document that there are shortcomings in the model that > would need to be audited at that time.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 16/16] blockdev: document transactional shortcomings

2018-09-06 Thread Jeff Cody
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:02:25AM -0400, John Snow wrote: > Presently only the backup job really guarantees what one would consider > transactional semantics. To guard against someone helpfully adding them > in the future, document that there are shortcomings in the model that > would need to be a

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 16/16] blockdev: document transactional shortcomings

2018-09-06 Thread John Snow
Presently only the backup job really guarantees what one would consider transactional semantics. To guard against someone helpfully adding them in the future, document that there are shortcomings in the model that would need to be audited at that time. Signed-off-by: John Snow --- blockdev.c | 8