Eric Blake writes:
> On 03/27/2015 06:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> On 03/26/2015 09:55 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Eric Blake writes:
> Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with
> expressions that aren't up to par. Later patch
On 03/27/2015 06:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> On 03/26/2015 09:55 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Eric Blake writes:
>>>
Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with
expressions that aren't up to par. Later patches will improve
the expec
Eric Blake writes:
> On 03/26/2015 09:55 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with
>>> expressions that aren't up to par. Later patches will improve
>>> the expected results as the generator is made stricter. Only
>>> o
On 03/26/2015 09:55 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with
>> expressions that aren't up to par. Later patches will improve
>> the expected results as the generator is made stricter. Only
>> one of the added tests actuall
Eric Blake writes:
> Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with
> expressions that aren't up to par. Later patches will improve
> the expected results as the generator is made stricter. Only
> one of the added tests actually behaves sanely at rejecting
> obvious problems.
>
> Not
Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with
expressions that aren't up to par. Later patches will improve
the expected results as the generator is made stricter. Only
one of the added tests actually behaves sanely at rejecting
obvious problems.
Note that in some cases, we reject ba
