Eric Blake writes:
> The previous commit demonstrated that the generator had several
> flaws with less-than-perfect enums:
> - an enum that listed the same string twice (or two variant
> strings that map to the same C enumerator) ended up generating
> an invalid C enum
> - because the generator a
The previous commit demonstrated that the generator had several
flaws with less-than-perfect enums:
- an enum that listed the same string twice (or two variant
strings that map to the same C enumerator) ended up generating
an invalid C enum
- because the generator adds a _MAX terminator to each enu