On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 14:42 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 03/20/2014 06:57 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 16:52 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> From: David Gibson
> >>
> >> The only model so far supported for VFIO passthrough devices is the model
> >> usuall
On 03/20/2014 06:57 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 16:52 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> From: David Gibson
>>
>> The only model so far supported for VFIO passthrough devices is the model
>> usually used on x86, where all of the guest's RAM is mapped into the
>> (host) IO
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 16:52 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> From: David Gibson
>
> The only model so far supported for VFIO passthrough devices is the model
> usually used on x86, where all of the guest's RAM is mapped into the
> (host) IOMMU and there is no IOMMU visible in the guest.
>
>
From: David Gibson
The only model so far supported for VFIO passthrough devices is the model
usually used on x86, where all of the guest's RAM is mapped into the
(host) IOMMU and there is no IOMMU visible in the guest.
This patch begins to relax this model, introducing the notion of a
VFIOAddres
