On 20.07.2016 00:58, Jeff Cody wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:28:11PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
space and compress it.
These patches add the ability to
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:28:11PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
> space and compress it.
>
> These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. T
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:13:24PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 07/04/2016 03:28 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> > by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
> > space and compress it.
> >
> > These
On 07/04/2016 03:28 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
space and compress it.
These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. This
functionality is imple
The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
space and compress it.
These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. This
functionality is implemented by means of adding options to the qmp/hmp
