On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 04:55:18 PDT (-0700), Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 11:45, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
This is another one that got queued up behind the decode tree stuff. I'd call
this a new feature, but give that it's been on the list and reviewed I'm not
sure if it's OK for mast
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 11:45, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> This is another one that got queued up behind the decode tree stuff. I'd call
> this a new feature, but give that it's been on the list and reviewed I'm not
> sure if it's OK for master right now.
>
> Peter: is this too much of a change for po
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:33:09 PDT (-0700), alistai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:45 AM Chih-Min Chao wrote:
This is the 5th version of the patch set, based on the Jim's previous work,
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-riscv/2019-02/msg00059.html
v4 -> v5:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:45 AM Chih-Min Chao wrote:
>
> This is the 5th version of the patch set, based on the Jim's previous work,
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-riscv/2019-02/msg00059.html
>
> v4 -> v5:
>- rebase 7074ab1
>- update the register xml files to
This is the 5th version of the patch set, based on the Jim's previous work,
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-riscv/2019-02/msg00059.html
v4 -> v5:
- rebase 7074ab1
- update the register xml files to gdb 8.3
- refine the fpu control registers, fflags/frm/fcsr
