Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] VFIO-based PCI device assignment

2012-09-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:01:35PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > Same goodness as v4, plus: > > - Addressed comments by Blue Swirl (thanks for the review) >(hopefully w/o breaking anything wrt slow bar endianness) > - Fixed a couple checkpatch warnings that snuck in > > BTW, this works fi

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] VFIO-based PCI device assignment

2012-09-21 Thread Alex Williamson
Ping. There don't seem to be any objections to this. Thanks, Alex On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:04 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:01 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > Same goodness as v4, plus: > > > > - Addressed comments by Blue Swirl (thanks for the review) > >(ho

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] VFIO-based PCI device assignment

2012-09-14 Thread Alex Williamson
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:01 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > Same goodness as v4, plus: > > - Addressed comments by Blue Swirl (thanks for the review) >(hopefully w/o breaking anything wrt slow bar endianness) > - Fixed a couple checkpatch warnings that snuck in > > BTW, this works fine with

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] VFIO-based PCI device assignment

2012-09-14 Thread Alex Williamson
Same goodness as v4, plus: - Addressed comments by Blue Swirl (thanks for the review) (hopefully w/o breaking anything wrt slow bar endianness) - Fixed a couple checkpatch warnings that snuck in BTW, this works fine with Jason's Q35 patches though we will need to add INTx routing support for