On 06/03/2013 05:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 May 2013 14:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 12 May 2013 13:55, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
In your opinion, is this patch set good enough in its actual state for
inclusion?
Are you expecting anything else from me (beside maybe adding more i.MX
On 12 May 2013 14:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 May 2013 13:55, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
>> In your opinion, is this patch set good enough in its actual state for
>> inclusion?
>>
>> Are you expecting anything else from me (beside maybe adding more i.MX
>> devices in the future)?
>
> I ha
On 12 May 2013 13:55, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
> In your opinion, is this patch set good enough in its actual state for
> inclusion?
>
> Are you expecting anything else from me (beside maybe adding more i.MX
> devices in the future)?
I haven't looked at this series yet because we're in codef
Peter (and all),
In your opinion, is this patch set good enough in its actual state for
inclusion?
Are you expecting anything else from me (beside maybe adding more i.MX
devices in the future)?
Thanks
JC
On 05/08/2013 10:28 AM, Jean-Christophe DUBOIS wrote:
This series of patches add the
This series of patches add the support for the i.MX25 processor through the
Freescale 3DS evaluation board.
For now a limited set of devices are supported.
* GPT timers (from i.MX31)
* EPIT timers (from i.MX31)
* Serial ports (from i.MX31)
* Ethernet FEC port
* I2C controller
