Thank you. Peter. sorry for forgetting about the patch for so long.
Xin
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 14 August 2014 01:09, Xin Tong wrote:
> > someone please reviews the patch when have time.
>
> Thanks; reviewed and applied to master. Apologies for
> the length o
On 14 August 2014 01:09, Xin Tong wrote:
> someone please reviews the patch when have time.
Thanks; reviewed and applied to master. Apologies for
the length of time this one's taken to get in.
-- PMM
someone please reviews the patch when have time.
Thanks a lot,
Xin
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Xin Tong wrote:
> Sorry for the absence. Forgot the patch in submission till then. I rebased
> the patch to the newest QEMU git repository and retook the performance
> improvement data. Please re
Sorry for the absence. Forgot the patch in submission till then. I rebased
the patch to the newest QEMU git repository and retook the performance
improvement data. Please review when have time.
Xin
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Xin Tong wrote:
> QEMU system mode page table walks are expensi
QEMU system mode page table walks are expensive. Taken by running QEMU
qemu-system-x86_64 system mode on Intel PIN , a TLB miss and walking a
4-level page tables in guest Linux OS takes ~450 X86 instructions on
average.
QEMU system mode TLB is implemented using a directly-mapped hashtable.
This st
