* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
> > +mis->postcopy_ram_state);
> > +if (mis->postcopy_ram_state == POSTCOPY_RAM_INCOMING_ADVISE) {
> > +/*
> > + * Where a migration had postcopy enabled (and
Il 07/10/2014 12:29, Dr. David Alan Gilbert ha scritto:
> You mean something like this (untested) ?
>
> if (mis->postcopy_ram_state != POSTCOPY_RAM_INCOMING_NONE) {
> if (mis->postcopy_ram_state == POSTCOPY_RAM_INCOMING_ADVISE) {
> /*
>* Where a migration had postcopy
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
> > +mis->postcopy_ram_state);
> > +if (mis->postcopy_ram_state == POSTCOPY_RAM_INCOMING_ADVISE) {
> > +/*
> > + * Where a migration had postcopy enabled (and
Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
> +mis->postcopy_ram_state);
> +if (mis->postcopy_ram_state == POSTCOPY_RAM_INCOMING_ADVISE) {
> +/*
> + * Where a migration had postcopy enabled (and thus went to advise)
> + * but managed to comp
Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
> +mis->postcopy_ram_state);
> +if (mis->postcopy_ram_state == POSTCOPY_RAM_INCOMING_ADVISE) {
> +/*
> + * Where a migration had postcopy enabled (and thus went to advise)
> + * but managed to comp
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
Tweak the end of migration cleanup; we don't want to close stuff down
at the end of the main stream, since the postcopy is still sending pages
on the other thread.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
---
migration.c | 23 ++-
1 file changed,
