On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:47:44PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> I've seen it go negative once during dev, it shouldn't
> happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reviewed-by: David Gibson
--
David Gibson| I'll h
Il 06/10/2014 20:51, Dr. David Alan Gilbert ha scritto:
> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
>>>
>>> I've seen it go negative once during dev, it shouldn't
>>> happen.
>>
>> You can move it earlier, perhaps even as patch 1,
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
> >
> > I've seen it go negative once during dev, it shouldn't
> > happen.
>
> You can move it earlier, perhaps even as patch 1, since it does not have
> any dependency on postcopy and can
Il 03/10/2014 19:47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) ha scritto:
>
> I've seen it go negative once during dev, it shouldn't
> happen.
You can move it earlier, perhaps even as patch 1, since it does not have
any dependency on postcopy and can go in at any time.
Paolo
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
I've seen it go negative once during dev, it shouldn't
happen.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
---
arch_init.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch_init.c b/arch_init.c
index a945990..2f4345a 100644
--- a/arch_init.c
+++ b/arch_init.c
@@
