Marc-André Lureau writes:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:16 PM Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>>
>> > These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
>> > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange
>> > Reviewed-by
Hi
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:16 PM Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>
> > These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
>
> Fails make check, dropp
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
Fails make check, dropping from today's pull request.
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
>> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> > -snip-
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I'd be willing to take this as is with a suitable TODO comment
>> >> explaining where we want to go with this file. Perha
Hi
- Original Message -
> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > -snip-
> >
> >>
> >> I'd be willing to take this as is with a suitable TODO comment
> >> explaining where we want to go with this file. Perhaps
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * This program tests
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> -snip-
>
>>
>> I'd be willing to take this as is with a suitable TODO comment
>> explaining where we want to go with this file. Perhaps
>>
>> /*
>> * This program tests QMP commands that aren't interesting enough to
>> * warra
Hi
- Original Message -
-snip-
>
> I'd be willing to take this as is with a suitable TODO comment
> explaining where we want to go with this file. Perhaps
>
> /*
> * This program tests QMP commands that aren't interesting enough to
> * warrant their own test program.
> *
> * TODO T
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
>> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>>
>> > These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
>> > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange
>> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
>> > ---
>> > t
Hi
- Original Message -
> Marc-André Lureau writes:
>
> > These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
> > ---
> > tests/test-qemu-qmp.c | 69
> > ++
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
> ---
> tests/test-qemu-qmp.c | 69
> ++
> tests/Mak
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
No objections to having QMP tests, but the ones fixed by PATCH 2 are QMP
input visitor bugs, which sneaked through the existing
test-qmp-input-visitor.c. Makes me suspect we should close the test
cover
These 2 tests exhibit two qmp bugs fixed by the previous patches.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
---
tests/test-qemu-qmp.c | 69 ++
tests/Makefile.include | 2 ++
tests/.gitignore
12 matches
Mail list logo