On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 03:35:26PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
[...]
> Yes, but it is a separate logical change, so I'd do that in a separate
> cleaup patch that amends it in the whole file ...
> (And I prefer to copy-paste code verbatim.)
Sure.
>
> > And, this patch is assuming MSIMessage as h
2016-10-08 14:37+0800, Peter Xu:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> The MMIO based interface to APIC doesn't work well with MSIs that have
>> upper address bits set (remapped x2APIC MSIs). A specialized interface
>> is a quick and dirty way to avoid the shortcoming.
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 02:37:59PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > The MMIO based interface to APIC doesn't work well with MSIs that have
> > upper address bits set (remapped x2APIC MSIs). A specialized interface
> > is a quick and dirty w
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:06:51PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The MMIO based interface to APIC doesn't work well with MSIs that have
> upper address bits set (remapped x2APIC MSIs). A specialized interface
> is a quick and dirty way to avoid the shortcoming.
>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov
> Si
The MMIO based interface to APIC doesn't work well with MSIs that have
upper address bits set (remapped x2APIC MSIs). A specialized interface
is a quick and dirty way to avoid the shortcoming.
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
---
v4: r-b Igor
v2: change apic_send_msi() to
