On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 03:46:13PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:35:17PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 05.03.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:13:41PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >> The existing apic_id = cpu_index code
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:35:17PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.03.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:13:41PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> The existing apic_id = cpu_index code has no visible effect: the PC code
> >> already initializes the APIC ID a
Am 05.03.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:13:41PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> The existing apic_id = cpu_index code has no visible effect: the PC code
>> already initializes the APIC ID according to the topology on
>> pc_new_cpu(), and linux-user memcpy()s th
On 05/03/2015 14:43, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:13:41PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> The existing apic_id = cpu_index code has no visible effect: the PC code
>> already initializes the APIC ID according to the topology on
>> pc_new_cpu(), and linux-user memcpy()s the
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:13:41PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The existing apic_id = cpu_index code has no visible effect: the PC code
> already initializes the APIC ID according to the topology on
> pc_new_cpu(), and linux-user memcpy()s the CPU state (including
> cpuid_apic_id) on cpu_copy()
The existing apic_id = cpu_index code has no visible effect: the PC code
already initializes the APIC ID according to the topology on
pc_new_cpu(), and linux-user memcpy()s the CPU state (including
cpuid_apic_id) on cpu_copy().
Remove the dead code and simply let APIC ID to to be 0 by default. Thi
