On 30/09/2018 18:19, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 9/26/18 11:42 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
>> take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
>> device directly.
>>
>> Let's generalize this by
Hi David,
On 9/26/18 11:42 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
> take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
> device directly.
>
> Let's generalize this by allowing memory devices to specify an optional
>
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:42:12 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
> take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
> device directly.
>
> Let's generalize this by allowing memory devices to specify an optio
When reporting the id of virtio-based memory devices, we always have to
take the one of the proxy device (parent), not the one of the memory
device directly.
Let's generalize this by allowing memory devices to specify an optional
"get_device_id" function. This id can then be used to report errors
