Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 26.09.2014 um 11:15 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> Kevin Wolf writes:
>>
>> > Am 24.09.2014 um 09:34 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> >> Eric Blake writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On 09/23/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> >> Eric Blake writes:
>> >> >>>
Am 26.09.2014 um 11:15 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Am 24.09.2014 um 09:34 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >> Eric Blake writes:
> >>
> >> > On 09/23/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> Eric Blake writes:
> >> >>> Add check_keys to cover these
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 24.09.2014 um 09:34 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>> > On 09/23/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Eric Blake writes:
>> >>> Add check_keys to cover these situations, and update testcases to
>> >>> match. A couple other tests (e
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 24.09.2014 um 09:34 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>> > On 09/23/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> Eric Blake writes:
>> >>> Add check_keys to cover these situations, and update testcases to
>> >>> match. A couple other tests (e
Am 24.09.2014 um 09:34 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
> > On 09/23/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Eric Blake writes:
> >>> Add check_keys to cover these situations, and update testcases to
> >>> match. A couple other tests (enum-missing-data, indented-ex
Eric Blake writes:
> On 09/23/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> The previous commit demonstrated that the generator overlooked some
>>> fairly basic broken expressions:
>>> - missing metataype
>>> - metatype key has a non-string value
>>> - unknown key in rela
On 09/23/2014 08:56 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> The previous commit demonstrated that the generator overlooked some
>> fairly basic broken expressions:
>> - missing metataype
>> - metatype key has a non-string value
>> - unknown key in relation to the metatype
>> - conf
Eric Blake writes:
> The previous commit demonstrated that the generator overlooked some
> fairly basic broken expressions:
> - missing metataype
> - metatype key has a non-string value
> - unknown key in relation to the metatype
> - conflicting metatype (this patch treats the second metatype as
The previous commit demonstrated that the generator overlooked some
fairly basic broken expressions:
- missing metataype
- metatype key has a non-string value
- unknown key in relation to the metatype
- conflicting metatype (this patch treats the second metatype as an
unknown key of the first key v
