Am 02.05.2016 um 23:09 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 05/02/2016 09:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 29.04.2016 um 22:08 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> Sector-based blk_write() should die; switch to byte-based
> >> blk_pwrite() instead. Likewise for blk_read().
> >>
> >> This file is doing some
On 05/02/2016 09:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.04.2016 um 22:08 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> Sector-based blk_write() should die; switch to byte-based
>> blk_pwrite() instead. Likewise for blk_read().
>>
>> This file is doing some complex computations to map various
>> flash page sizes (256,
Am 29.04.2016 um 22:08 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> Sector-based blk_write() should die; switch to byte-based
> blk_pwrite() instead. Likewise for blk_read().
>
> This file is doing some complex computations to map various
> flash page sizes (256, 512, and 2048) atop generic uses of
> 512-byte s
Sector-based blk_write() should die; switch to byte-based
blk_pwrite() instead. Likewise for blk_read().
This file is doing some complex computations to map various
flash page sizes (256, 512, and 2048) atop generic uses of
512-byte sector operations. Perhaps someone will want to tidy
up the fil