On 2011-12-15 12:54, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 12:33 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Any thoughts on the qemu-kvm merge plan? Sounds painful.
>>>
>>> Pain will be where the existing qemu-kvm extensions collide with these
>>> refactored upstream devices (backend/frontend split specifically).
On 12/15/2011 12:33 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on the qemu-kvm merge plan? Sounds painful.
> >
> > Pain will be where the existing qemu-kvm extensions collide with these
> > refactored upstream devices (backend/frontend split specifically).
> > That's where we have to merge very
On 2011-12-12 17:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-12-12 17:37, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:52:19PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - rebased of current uq/master
>>> - fixed stupid bugs that broke bisectability and user space irqchip mode
>>> - integrated NMI
On 12/12/2011 07:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > It's a little late for this, but refactoring qemu-kvm in-tree and then
> > splitting it into patches would have been easier. Let's try it this way
> > for the next batch.
>
> I thought about this, but it definitely takes a clean, qemu-kvm free
> base a
On 2011-12-12 18:37, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 06:51 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on the qemu-kvm merge plan? Sounds painful.
>>
>> Pain will be where the existing qemu-kvm extensions collide with these
>> refactored upstream devices (backend/frontend split specifically).
>> T
On 12/12/2011 06:51 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > Any thoughts on the qemu-kvm merge plan? Sounds painful.
>
> Pain will be where the existing qemu-kvm extensions collide with these
> refactored upstream devices (backend/frontend split specifically).
> That's where we have to merge very carefully.
On 2011-12-12 17:37, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:52:19PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Changes in v4:
>> - rebased of current uq/master
>> - fixed stupid bugs that broke bisectability and user space irqchip mode
>> - integrated NMI-over-LINT1 injection logic
>>
>> CC: Lai Jian
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:52:19PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Changes in v4:
> - rebased of current uq/master
> - fixed stupid bugs that broke bisectability and user space irqchip mode
> - integrated NMI-over-LINT1 injection logic
>
> CC: Lai Jiangshan
>
> Jan Kiszka (15):
> msi: Generalize ms
On 2011-12-08 22:25, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:52, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Changes in v4:
>> - rebased of current uq/master
>> - fixed stupid bugs that broke bisectability and user space irqchip mode
>> - integrated NMI-over-LINT1 injection logic
>
> I had comments to one patch,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:52, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Changes in v4:
> - rebased of current uq/master
> - fixed stupid bugs that broke bisectability and user space irqchip mode
> - integrated NMI-over-LINT1 injection logic
I had comments to one patch, others look fine.
Overall, string based subtype
Changes in v4:
- rebased of current uq/master
- fixed stupid bugs that broke bisectability and user space irqchip mode
- integrated NMI-over-LINT1 injection logic
CC: Lai Jiangshan
Jan Kiszka (15):
msi: Generalize msix_supported to msi_supported
kvm: Move kvmclock into hw/kvm folder
apic:
11 matches
Mail list logo