On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:14:00 -0400
John Snow wrote:
> The qmp-shell is a little rudimentary, but it can be hacked
> to give us some transactional support without too much difficulty.
>
> (1) Prep.
> (2) Add support for serializing json arrays and
> improve the robustness of QMP parsing
> (3)
On Tue, 05 May 2015 11:34:02 -0400
John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 05/05/2015 08:52 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > I lost track of it. Is v4 a new posting?
>
> Yup. Latest with fixes. Eric re-reviewed it all and Kashyap (and I)
> tested it.
OK, I'm queuing it for my next pass over my qmp-patches m
On 05/05/2015 08:52 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
I lost track of it. Is v4 a new posting?
Yup. Latest with fixes. Eric re-reviewed it all and Kashyap (and I)
tested it.
--js
On Mon, 04 May 2015 15:24:02 -0400
John Snow wrote:
> Ping
> (I should've CC'd Luiz to begin with ...)
>
> Eric's given this series the once over and Kashyap has tested it, so it
> should in theory be good to go.
I lost track of it. Is v4 a new posting?
>
> On 04/29/2015 03:14 PM, John Snow
Ping
(I should've CC'd Luiz to begin with ...)
Eric's given this series the once over and Kashyap has tested it, so it
should in theory be good to go.
On 04/29/2015 03:14 PM, John Snow wrote:
The qmp-shell is a little rudimentary, but it can be hacked
to give us some transactional support wit
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:14:00PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> The qmp-shell is a little rudimentary, but it can be hacked
> to give us some transactional support without too much difficulty.
>
> (1) Prep.
> (2) Add support for serializing json arrays and
> improve the robustness of QMP parsing
The qmp-shell is a little rudimentary, but it can be hacked
to give us some transactional support without too much difficulty.
(1) Prep.
(2) Add support for serializing json arrays and
improve the robustness of QMP parsing
(3) Add a special transaction( ... ) syntax that lets users
build u
