On 01/06/2012 01:04 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:41:33 -0600
Michael Roth wrote:
On 01/05/2012 02:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:10:50 -0600
Michael Roth wrote:
On 01/05/2012 08:42 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:59:27 +
"Da
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:41:33 -0600
Michael Roth wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 02:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:10:50 -0600
> > Michael Roth wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/05/2012 08:42 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:59:27 +
> >>> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrot
On 01/05/2012 02:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:10:50 -0600
Michael Roth wrote:
On 01/05/2012 08:42 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:59:27 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 5 Ja
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:10:50 -0600
Michael Roth wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 08:42 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:59:27 +
> > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
> >>> "D
On 01/05/2012 09:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:04:57AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
On 01/05/2012 06:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
O
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:04:57AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 06:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
> >>"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:45:11PM -
On 01/05/2012 08:42 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:59:27 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:45:11PM -0200, Luiz Capitul
On 01/05/2012 06:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:45:11PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
This version drops modes 'sleep' and 'hybrid' beca
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:59:27 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
> > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:45:11PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > This version
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:37:14AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:45:11PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > This version drops modes 'sleep' and 'hybrid' because they don't work
> > > properly due
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:16:30 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:45:11PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > This version drops modes 'sleep' and 'hybrid' because they don't work
> > properly due to issues in qemu. Only the 'hibernate' mode is supported
> > for now.
>
> I
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:45:11PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> This version drops modes 'sleep' and 'hybrid' because they don't work
> properly due to issues in qemu. Only the 'hibernate' mode is supported
> for now.
IMHO this is short-sighted. When the bugs QEMU in are fixed so that
these mod
This version drops modes 'sleep' and 'hybrid' because they don't work
properly due to issues in qemu. Only the 'hibernate' mode is supported
for now.
Also note that virtio doesn't currently support ACPI S4. There are
patches flying on lkml to fix that though.
Please refer to patch 2/2 for more de
13 matches
Mail list logo