On 8 July 2012 11:59, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 08.07.2012 12:01, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 8 July 2012 10:55, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>>> Wouldn't it be better to use "unsigned int" instead on all the "start"
>>> and "length" arguments?
>>
>> See the arguments about this on one of the previous pa
Am 08.07.2012 12:01, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 8 July 2012 10:55, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to use "unsigned int" instead on all the "start" and
"length" arguments?
See the arguments about this on one of the previous patch series:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/
On 8 July 2012 10:55, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to use "unsigned int" instead on all the "start" and
> "length" arguments?
See the arguments about this on one of the previous patch series:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-06/msg04304.html
-- PMM
Peter Maydell writes:
[...]
> +/**
> + * extract32:
> + * @value: the value to extract the bit field from
> + * @start: the lowest bit in the bit field (numbered from 0)
> + * @length: the length of the bit field
> + *
> + * Extract from the 32 bit input @value the bit field specified by the
> + *
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Add functions deposit32(), deposit64(), extract32() and extract64()
> to extract and deposit bitfields in 32 and 64 bit words. Based on
> ideas by Jia Liu and Avi Kivity.
>
> Suggested-by: Jia Liu
> Suggested-by: Avi Kivity
> Signed-off-by:
Add functions deposit32(), deposit64(), extract32() and extract64()
to extract and deposit bitfields in 32 and 64 bit words. Based on
ideas by Jia Liu and Avi Kivity.
Suggested-by: Jia Liu
Suggested-by: Avi Kivity
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber
