Thanks, applied.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> Changes since v3:
>- using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa_add() routine.
>- removed call to bitmak_zero() since bitmap_new() also zeros' the bitmap.
>- Rebased to the latest qemu.
>
> Changes since v2:
>
us.ibm.com; k...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's
> -numa option
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:31:30PM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> > Changes since v3:
> >- using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa
AM
To: Vinod, Chegu
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; aligu...@us.ibm.com; k...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's
-numa option
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:31:30PM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> Changes since v3:
>- using bitmap_set()
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:31:30PM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
> Changes since v3:
>- using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa_add() routine.
>- removed call to bitmak_zero() since bitmap_new() also zeros' the bitmap.
>- Rebased to the latest qemu.
Tested-by: Eduardo Habkost
Revi
Changes since v3:
- using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa_add() routine.
- removed call to bitmak_zero() since bitmap_new() also zeros' the bitmap.
- Rebased to the latest qemu.
Changes since v2:
- Using "unsigned long *" for the node_cpumask[].
- Use bitmap_new() instead