Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's -numa option

2012-08-04 Thread Blue Swirl
Thanks, applied. On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Chegu Vinod wrote: > Changes since v3: >- using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa_add() routine. >- removed call to bitmak_zero() since bitmap_new() also zeros' the bitmap. >- Rebased to the latest qemu. > > Changes since v2: >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's -numa option

2012-07-31 Thread Eduardo Habkost
us.ibm.com; k...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's > -numa option > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:31:30PM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote: > > Changes since v3: > >- using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's -numa option

2012-07-18 Thread Vinod, Chegu
AM To: Vinod, Chegu Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; aligu...@us.ibm.com; k...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's -numa option On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:31:30PM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote: > Changes since v3: >- using bitmap_set()

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's -numa option

2012-07-18 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:31:30PM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote: > Changes since v3: >- using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa_add() routine. >- removed call to bitmak_zero() since bitmap_new() also zeros' the bitmap. >- Rebased to the latest qemu. Tested-by: Eduardo Habkost Revi

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes related to processing of qemu's -numa option

2012-07-16 Thread Chegu Vinod
Changes since v3: - using bitmap_set() instead of set_bit() in numa_add() routine. - removed call to bitmak_zero() since bitmap_new() also zeros' the bitmap. - Rebased to the latest qemu. Changes since v2: - Using "unsigned long *" for the node_cpumask[]. - Use bitmap_new() instead