On 29.05.14 03:53, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 05/29/2014 01:11 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.05.14 07:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The spapr-pci PHB initializes IOMMU for emulated devices only.
The upcoming VFIO support will do it different. However both emulated
and VFIO PHB types sh
On 05/29/2014 01:11 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 27.05.14 07:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> The spapr-pci PHB initializes IOMMU for emulated devices only.
>> The upcoming VFIO support will do it different. However both emulated
>> and VFIO PHB types share most of the initialization code.
>
On 27.05.14 07:36, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The spapr-pci PHB initializes IOMMU for emulated devices only.
The upcoming VFIO support will do it different. However both emulated
and VFIO PHB types share most of the initialization code.
For the type specific things a new finish_realize() callba
The spapr-pci PHB initializes IOMMU for emulated devices only.
The upcoming VFIO support will do it different. However both emulated
and VFIO PHB types share most of the initialization code.
For the type specific things a new finish_realize() callback is
introduced.
This introduces sPAPRPHBClass d