On 04/25/2018 03:27 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Corey,
On 04/25/2018 12:27 PM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
From: Corey Minyard
The vmstate for isa_ipmi_bt was referencing into the bt structure,
instead create a bt structure separate and use that.
The version 1 of the BT transfer was fair
Hi Corey,
On 04/25/2018 12:27 PM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard
>
> The vmstate for isa_ipmi_bt was referencing into the bt structure,
> instead create a bt structure separate and use that.
>
> The version 1 of the BT transfer was fairly broken, if a migration
> occured during an
From: Corey Minyard
The vmstate for isa_ipmi_bt was referencing into the bt structure,
instead create a bt structure separate and use that.
The version 1 of the BT transfer was fairly broken, if a migration
occured during an IPMI operation, it is likely the migration would
be corrupted because I
