Am 24.06.2016 um 16:15 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 06/24/2016 12:43 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 06/23 16:37, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
> >> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_discard and
> >> discard_alignment.
On 06/24/2016 12:43 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 06/23 16:37, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
>> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_discard and
>> discard_alignment. Rename them, using 'pdiscard' as an aid to
>> track which re
On Thu, 06/23 16:37, Eric Blake wrote:
> Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
> quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_discard and
> discard_alignment. Rename them, using 'pdiscard' as an aid to
> track which remaining discard interfaces need conversion, and
Sector-based limits are awkward to think about; in our on-going
quest to move to byte-based interfaces, convert max_discard and
discard_alignment. Rename them, using 'pdiscard' as an aid to
track which remaining discard interfaces need conversion, and so
that the compiler will help us catch the ch
