On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:57:26PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> Presently we codify the entry point for a job as the "start" callback,
> but a more apt name would be "run" to clarify the idea that when this
> function returns we consider the job to have "finished," except for
> any cleanup which occur
Presently we codify the entry point for a job as the "start" callback,
but a more apt name would be "run" to clarify the idea that when this
function returns we consider the job to have "finished," except for
any cleanup which occurs in separate callbacks later.
As part of this clarification, chan
