On 8/29/19 2:58 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 8/29/19 8:43 PM, John Snow wrote:
>> On 8/29/19 2:27 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> This restrict test 208 to the Linux platform, is this OK?
>>>
>>> The rest looks good.
>>
>> I forgot about that, so good catch.
>>
>> I don't know. W
On 8/29/19 8:43 PM, John Snow wrote:
> On 8/29/19 2:27 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> This restrict test 208 to the Linux platform, is this OK?
>>
>> The rest looks good.
>
> I forgot about that, so good catch.
>
> I don't know. We seem to already restrict a LOT of tests to the Linux
> plat
On 8/29/19 2:27 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> This restrict test 208 to the Linux platform, is this OK?
>
> The rest looks good.
I forgot about that, so good catch.
I don't know. We seem to already restrict a LOT of tests to the Linux
platform. Does this one actually work on other platf
On 8/21/19 1:52 AM, John Snow wrote:
> Like script_main, but doesn't require a single point of entry.
> Replace all existing initialization sections with this drop-in replacement.
>
> This brings debug support to all existing script-style iotests.
>
> Note: supported_oses=['linux'] was omitted, a
Like script_main, but doesn't require a single point of entry.
Replace all existing initialization sections with this drop-in replacement.
This brings debug support to all existing script-style iotests.
Note: supported_oses=['linux'] was omitted, as it is a default argument.
---
tests/qemu-iotes
