On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 06:18:43PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>On 18/07/19 03:04, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
>> could be calculate the last word mask directly.
>>
>> Remove the unnecessary size.
>
>Hi,
>
>the value left in nr is _not_ th
On 18/07/19 03:04, Wei Yang wrote:
> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
> could be calculate the last word mask directly.
>
> Remove the unnecessary size.
Hi,
the value left in nr is _not_ the number of bits for the last word if
the start and the end are in the s
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 07:27:14PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>On 21/07/19 02:33, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:04:55AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
>>> could be calculate the last word mask directly.
>>>
>>> Remove
On 21/07/19 02:33, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:04:55AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
>> could be calculate the last word mask directly.
>>
>> Remove the unnecessary size.
>>
>
> May I ask why Patch 2 is picked up, but
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:04:55AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
>could be calculate the last word mask directly.
>
>Remove the unnecessary size.
>
May I ask why Patch 2 is picked up, but this one is not?
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
>
>-
The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
could be calculate the last word mask directly.
Remove the unnecessary size.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
---
v2: refine bitmap_set_atomic too, suggested from Peter
---
util/bitmap.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+),
