On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 08:25:51PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 08:22 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 20:10 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 12/12/2011 08:04 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:19 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Th
On 12/12/2011 08:22 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 20:10 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/12/2011 08:04 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:19 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This was doing something evil building a dt tree so we broke the device.
@@ -71
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 20:10 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 08:04 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:19 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> This was doing something evil building a dt tree so we broke the device.
> >
> >> @@ -711,8 +711,12 @@ VIOsPAPRBus *spapr_vi
On 12/12/2011 08:04 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:19 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This was doing something evil building a dt tree so we broke the device.
@@ -711,8 +711,12 @@ VIOsPAPRBus *spapr_vio_bus_init(void)
spapr_rtas_register("ibm,set-tce-bypass", rtas_se
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:19 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This was doing something evil building a dt tree so we broke the device.
> @@ -711,8 +711,12 @@ VIOsPAPRBus *spapr_vio_bus_init(void)
> spapr_rtas_register("ibm,set-tce-bypass", rtas_set_tce_bypass);
> spapr_rtas_register("quies
This was doing something evil building a dt tree so we broke the device.
---
hw/spapr_llan.c | 39 ---
hw/spapr_vio.c | 52 +---
hw/spapr_vio.h | 29 +++--
hw/spapr_vscsi.c | 35
